Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, September 02, 2026

For those interested, the US Mint today released a one dollar legal tender coin with Trump's' face printed on the front. It will only be made through Dec 31 of this year. The US Mint is selling them in $50 rolls and $100 bags priced for collecting.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

I got mine ordered.

Who wouldn't want a coin with Trump on it?

#1 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 05:34 PM | Reply

"I got mine ordered."

Remember how you got all upset when someone suggested you'd LITERALLY "bought into" the Triump'a grift???

Thanks for more proof!

#2 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 05:37 PM | Reply

"Who wouldn't want a coin with Trump on it?"

Especially one that drops 33% in value when you open the box!

#3 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 05:39 PM | Reply

I got mine ordered.
Who wouldn't want a coin with Trump on it?

Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 05:34 PM | Reply

Cultist gonna cult.

#4 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-09-02 05:39 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Remember how you got all upset when someone suggested you'd LITERALLY "bought into" the Triump'a grift???"

That was regarding the "Trump Bible". It wasn't grift. There was no scam.

And I didn't purchase it because I collect Trump stuff (although I do have a life-size Trump that used to be in my office for laughs)

I have many different bibles I have purchased over the years.

The Trump bible was for my collection.

The coins were just for the fun of it.

A few years I also purchased some Space Force 2 dollar bills that were pretty cool with Space Force artwork. They are also legal tender.

But I don't collect Trump stuff.

#5 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 06:09 PM | Reply

Another troll thread.

You guys still not believing BullJohnson and BullBringer are the same person yet their MO are identical.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-09-02 06:20 PM | Reply

He calls Trump "smart."
He is smart at trolling.

"I got mine ordered.
Who wouldn't want a coin with Trump on it?
#1 | Posted by BillJohnson"

Flies with that?

#7 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-09-02 06:30 PM | Reply

You guys still not believing BullJohnson and BullBringer are the same person yet their MO are identical.
#6 | Posted by ClownShack

I think the only thing they have in common is one could wonder about the other people in their lives. Although I do think they have them.

Some of the others here who claim spouses or acquaintances, I either doubt it entirely, or you'd have to feel really sorry for them.

#8 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-09-02 06:33 PM | Reply

CAN you even imagine the utter OUTRAGE from the rwing had brown-suit Nigerian Obama put his image and name on a US coin?

BJ would have left his wife and started dating Peter Paul Montgomery Buttigieg!

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2026-09-02 07:16 PM | Reply

ICE agents look forward to buying rolls of Trump coins, and patriotically sodomizing detainees with them.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-09-02 07:31 PM | Reply

It may be that Heffy is hosting on Fox News now:

"Fox News host CUTS OFF interview after James Talarico fact checks him":

www.youtube.com

short

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-09-02 07:36 PM | Reply

9. Everyone forgets the Dijon mustard. What an outrage!

#12 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-09-02 08:04 PM | Reply

Elizabeth Windsor had her face on the currency for 8 decades.

#13 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-09-02 08:07 PM | Reply

James Talarico EDUCATES Lauren Boebert for calling America a Christian nation

www.youtube.com

short, just for fun

#14 | Posted by Corky at 2026-09-02 08:37 PM | Reply

Who wouldn't want a coin with Trump on it?

#1 | Posted by BillJohnson

Oh I dunno, anyone who isn't a stupid sack of s*&^?

Just a guess...

#15 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-02 08:41 PM | Reply

9. Everyone forgets the Dijon mustard. What an outrage!

#12 | Posted by Dbt2

Thank you for reminding me! It really puts things into context how today's constant fauxrage is so misplaced.

#16 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-02 08:42 PM | Reply

" That was regarding the "Trump Bible"."

And the Trump hat.

And the Trump claim 2020 was stolen.

And the Trump demand the immigration bill blown up.

And now the copper "Gold" coin, overvalued (at a minimum) by 50%.

You bought into them all. Some literally.

#17 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 08:46 PM | Reply

Even JeffJ can recognize that the leader minting a coin in his own image is Banana Republic fascism.

He can't say it out loud, but he can recognize it.

But I don't think BillJohnson can recognize it.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-09-02 08:50 PM | Reply

Only pedophile child rapists like Bill Johnson give a shit about a PEDO coin.

#19 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-09-02 09:20 PM | Reply

apropos of things being released today...

James Talarico drops new ad RIPPING Ken Paxton for dodging debates
www.youtube.com
short

#20 | Posted by Corky at 2026-09-02 09:29 PM | Reply

Dan,

"And the Trump hat."

Yes. I have a MAGA hat I wore to a Trump rally.

It felt strange since Trump was the first Republican I had endorsed since Reagan.

The Democrats had gone loco and Trump was the more logical choice. I didn't want Hillary nominating the next Supreme Court justices. Trump ended up nominating three.

Now Democrats appear to be moving even further to the left.

They're giving me even less reason to consider voting for them again.

#21 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 09:55 PM | Reply

Lying Dan,

"You bought into them all."

#17
As usual....you mix lies with facts.

#22 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 09:58 PM | Reply

"I have a MAGA hat I wore to a Trump rally."

So, in multiple ways, you bought into it.

"The Democrats had gone loco"

You forget some of us were around at the time. The Obergefell decision came out. That was the day YOU went loco.

#23 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 10:01 PM | Reply

"you mix lies with facts."

You misspelled observations.

You either figuratively or literally bought into them.

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 10:05 PM | Reply

"you mix lies with facts."

Point out the lie.

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 10:08 PM | Reply

Annnnnnnd BillJ runs away when asked to tell the truth.

#26 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 10:37 PM | Reply

Dan,

"You forget some of us were around at the time. The Obergefell decision came out. That was the day YOU went loco."

Gay marriage didn't offend me. I thought legal recognition of gay relationships could encourage commitment, stability and lasting relationships. I was more inclined toward civil unions. That's water under the bridge.

Same sex marriage became legal in VA on Oct 6, 2014, after the US Supreme Court declined to review a lower court's decision.

Gavin Grimm's lawsuit against the Gloucester County School Board was filed June 11, 2015. The ACLU represented Grimm, a 16 year old student who was born female and identified as male, seeking access to the boys restrooms.

Fifteen days later, on June 26, the Supreme Court issued the Obergefell decision recognizing a constitutional right to same sex marriage nationwide.

Supporting legal recognition of gay relationships didn't mean I supported replacing sex based rules for restrooms and changing rooms with rules based on gender identity.

Those developments brought that distinction quickly into focus for me. The legal disputes extended beyond marriage, and I became concerned about how the current Supreme Court might approach other questions involving sex and gender, and just how far other rulings might go.

I worried that future rulings could actually require schools and other institutions to allow people born male access to women's restrooms and changing rooms based on gender identity instead of sex. I was concerned the same Court that decided Obergefell might uphold those requirements as well.

Then, by the 2016 election, Scalia's seat was already vacant. Kennedy's was another potential vacancy. Both were Reagan appointees. If Hillary had the opportunity to fill both seats and her nominees were confirmed, she could replace two Republican appointees with justices of her choice and move the Court 2 more seats further to the left.

That was THE reason I voted for Trump. No other...Dan. Those appointments could shape the Supreme Court and its decisions for decades.

I feared a further shift to the left could have devastating consequences for society.

#27 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 11:05 PM | Reply

Dan,

I don't run...I write slow.

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 11:06 PM | Reply

Dan,

I have never said Trump was the rightful winner in 2020.

#29 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 11:11 PM | Reply

Good night Dan....

#30 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 11:12 PM | Reply

"Supporting legal recognition of gay relationships didn't mean I supported replacing sex based rules for restrooms and changing rooms with rules based on gender identity."

What a convenient skirt to hide behind! But, of course, you're used to that.

"I worried that future rulings could actually require schools and other institutions to allow people born male access to women's restrooms and changing rooms"

Of course you did. Keep telling yourself that was the real reason: to save the world from folks who go into a private stall to change clothes.

Ultimately, Obergefell showed you'd given up on the possible love of your life. Now, you feared TRANS people would get the same rights you had to marry a woman to get. That was a bridge too far.

...just observations...

#31 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 11:15 PM | Reply

Dan,

"What a convenient skirt to hide behind!"

Typical....

You lie so much you assume everyone does.

#32 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 11:17 PM | Reply

"I have never said Trump was the rightful winner in 2020."

True. You've only tried to undermine Biden's win with unfounded theories. You floated lies. Lies so wild, there is NO EVIDENCE after almost six years.

You know, Bill...for smart folks, no evidence after six years would force them to either rethink their theory, or admit it was wrong.

What does no evidence after six years do to folks like you?

#33 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 11:19 PM | Reply

"You lie so much you assume everyone does."

GFY. You still haven't pointed out a single specific lie, dumfuq. How about backing up your accusations?

#34 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 11:21 PM | Reply

"Good night Dan...."

What's the over/under on further posts?

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 11:21 PM | Reply

"I feared a further shift to the left could have devastating consequences for society."

Society? You mean YOU.

And your fear? Trans folks would get rights you had to give up the love of your life to get.

Unforgivable, right?

#36 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-02 11:23 PM | Reply

"I don't care that Trump lies about being the rightful winner". - BJ

For when legitimacy isn't important in your Presidential politics.

Caring more about getting your way on political and social issues whether the Pres in legitimate or not is unpatriotic to the max.

#37 | Posted by Corky at 2026-09-02 11:24 PM | Reply

Does anyone, looking at you Bill, need more proof that Donald J. Trump is narcissistic megalomaniac ? Anyone?

#38 | Posted by et_al at 2026-09-02 11:45 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Keep telling yourself that was the real reason: to save the world from folks who go into a private stall to change clothes"

Alright...here it is.

It was to prevent women from becoming second class citizens to men....again.

A dirty little secret is how much of the gay male population have little use or regard for the female sex and frankly are misogynist.

They would have no problem with forcing cisgender women and their daughters to use single user restroom facilities in public places to accommodate transgender females if it made them uncomfortable. They wouldn't care if women and children are inconvenienced. No problem at all. Did you read what some people were writing? Liberals are all about social engineering. Force people to tolerate you one way or another. Desensitize people.

We saw Target try that and it didn't go well for them.

Imagine if the Supreme Court passed such laws and forced this nationwide.

Think it couldn't happen? Yea...it really could.

Thankfully Trump won and killed those aspirations of transgender dominance.

#39 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-02 11:49 PM | Reply

It was to prevent women from becoming second class citizens to men....again.

Again? More like still. Ask your wife. Women could only open their own checking accounts in the 70's ffs.

#40 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-09-02 11:51 PM | Reply

"... dominance."

In what reality does a 5% or less voting demographic assert political dominance? Is it DSA? Transgender? LGBTQ... alphabet soup? Nazis? Liberals? Progressives? Which one or more asserts dominance. Not airwaves. Political dominance? Which one or more?

#41 | Posted by et_al at 2026-09-03 12:03 AM | Reply


Women could only open their own checking accounts in the 70's ffs.

#40 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

Oh FFS Alexa.....

1862 ...
In 1862 California passed legislation which began the savings and loan industry in the state, and established financial independence of women no matter what their marital status.

[The San Francisco Savings Union's] early published pamphlets confirmed the rights of women depositors, advertising that "Married women and minors, making deposits in their own name, can withdraw them themselves." Less than two months after its incorporation and shortly after opening its doors, Saving Union directors approved the first loan to a woman customer.
libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org

#42 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-09-03 12:03 AM | Reply

Alex,

"Again? More like still. Ask your wife."

I'm sure it's true.

Now imagine it being even worse.

Women with daughters going into stores now that transgender laws are passed. It really could have happened if Hillary had won.

You can't call the police if you see what is obviously a man in the bathroom. So you walk out.

I will ask her tomorrow.

Be the topic for the day.

#43 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-03 12:05 AM | Reply

That was the ONLY state, you lying little weasel.

Historical Timeline of Women and Banking
1862: California became the first state to allow women to open bank accounts independently regardless of marital status.
Pre-1974: While no federal law explicitly banned women from holding a basic bank account, many banks had unchecked discretion. Lenders routinely required a husband's permission or a male cosigner to open checking accounts, get credit cards, or secure loans.
1974: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act made it illegal for financial institutions to discriminate against applicants based on sex or marital status

1974. My dog (and AI) is smarter than you.

#44 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-09-03 12:05 AM | Reply

In what reality does a 5% or less voting demographic assert political dominance?

LOL He's not talking about political dominance .. he's talking about in the restroom, and sports imposing their dominance on little girls.

#45 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-09-03 12:06 AM | Reply

Women with daughters going into stores now that transgender laws are passed. It really could have happened if Hillary had won.

The problem is straight men abusing little girls. Let's be real about this.

#46 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-09-03 12:06 AM | Reply

#44 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

Your assertion was false.

#47 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-09-03 12:07 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort