Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, October 24, 2025

After 123 years, the East Wing of the White House is no more. With no construction permits and no approved plans, President Donald Trump took less than two days to destroy an iconic image that was the first stop for anyone who had gone for an official tour of the People's House. Trump plans to build a 90,000-square-foot, $300 million ballroom.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The East Wing of the White House, which will be torn down by this weekend to make way for President Trump's new ballroom, has been a base for the first lady, an entryway for social functions and an emergency bunker. Here's what to know about its history.[image or embed]

" The New York Times (@nytimes.com) Oct 23, 2025 at 6:55 AM

New satellite images show the scale of demolition that has occurred on the East Wing of the White House in less than a month.[image or embed]

" Bellingcat (@bellingcat.com) Oct 23, 2025 at 3:02 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

If a Muslim or "Antifa" had done this destruction, Trump/MAGA would have launched a pogrom against them.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2025-10-24 07:56 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

It should be noted that the Trump Administration has not denied, when asked directly, if Donald has the power to destroy the Jefferson Memorial.

Donald Trump is jealous of past presidents and the respect shown to them.

When people with Donald's mental illness get jealous (and that's easy for them to do), they get dangerous.

So, yes. The Jefferson Memorial is at some risk.

And if Donald began demolition, every one of us here knows exactly what he would say"

"I HAVE AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT".

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-10-24 08:13 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

No American would do this. Donald Trump is a Russian asset.

#3 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-10-24 09:04 AM | Reply

#3 | Posted by Alexandrite

I'm going to enjoy seeing Trump's ballroom picked apart after he dies.

I hope they put it on live stream. I'd do pay-to-view.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2025-10-24 09:22 AM | Reply

BREAKING: In a shocking moment, Karoline Leavitt admits that, as Americans are suffering behind high grocery prices and insurance premiums, "the ballroom is really the president's main priority."

Trump doesn't give a rat's patoot about anything else.

#5 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-10-24 09:23 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Makes you wonder what horrible crime Trump or his family committed in the east wing for them to demolish it so quickly.

#6 | Posted by qcp at 2025-10-24 09:26 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

A perfect metaphor.

#7 | Posted by YAV at 2025-10-24 09:33 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I wonder what Trump could be compensating for with his huge ballroom.

#8 | Posted by MBlue at 2025-10-24 09:58 AM | Reply

Trump said he wouldn't touch the East Wing.

Then he tore it all down.

It's a disgrace and an American tragedy.

You cannot believe a word this man says.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 10:06 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Makes you wonder what horrible crime Trump or his family committed in the east wing for them to demolish it so quickly.

#6 | POSTED BY QCP

Removing all traces of where the Epstein Files were once kept?

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 10:08 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Meanwhile, SNAP funding will end at the end of this month leaving millions of Americans to go hungry.

Just shows you how this so called POTUS really feels about the people.

#11 | Posted by path at 2025-10-24 10:15 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This breaks my heart

Just a fact-based reminder

Trump is a temporary resident of the White House. He does not own it, nor does have even have control over it.

That building belongs to us, the US citizens.

Any significant change should ONLY come at the approval of the people's representatives-Congress.

And for those arguing that the people aren't paying for it, that is decidedly NOT a good thing. It is, in fact, decidedly, a bad thing.

That means ONLY that unknown actors are paying for access to the president, i.e. bribing him. That is OUR building, WE should be deciding it's construction and WE should be paying for it.

The "wrong" of this is so monumental as to beggar words.

This action has hit me harder in ways that other even worse things haven't, even the murdering he is doing.

Maybe it is my love of history, maybe it is my particular reverence for our heritage. Maybe it was I was prepared for the assaults on our liberties, I was prepared for murder, I was prepared for fascism. I was not prepared for the destruction of one of our nation's primary symbols.

I FEEL like I felt during the assault on the Capitol, like I am being violated.

This man has zero respect for our country; it is beyond despairing.

#12 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-10-24 10:22 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 6

I FEEL like I felt during the assault on the Capitol, like I am being violated.

A completely valid and honest visceral reaction, IMHO. I agree with all you posted.
My hope is this finally wakes up enough people to end this.

#13 | Posted by YAV at 2025-10-24 10:32 AM | Reply

thanks a hell of a lot, Trump voters.
You all SUCK!

#14 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-10-24 10:39 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Who would be stupid enough to sign a contract with Trumpy for anything?

Much less the destruction of the east wing of the White House.

The Bin Laden and Sons Destruction Company?

#15 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 10:56 AM | Reply

The Bin Laden and Sons Destruction Company?

#15 | Posted by donnerboy

Which reminds me that Bin Laden originally targeted it on 9/ii but shifted to the Capitol as an easier target.

So Donald Trump is finishing the job that Osama could not do.

Good job.

#16 | Posted by Zed at 2025-10-24 10:58 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It is, in fact, decidedly, a bad thing.

There has never been a 'no-strings attached' donation in Donald Trump's life.

#17 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-10-24 11:34 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Defenders seem to keep wanting to point to Truman's overhaul of the White House, but that's because it was structurally troubled. It was a necessity.

No one else has done, to the degree, that Trump is doing now...and that's why it's getting this attention.

This is Trump being Trump. Leaving his stain on everything.

#18 | Posted by brass30 at 2025-10-24 12:06 PM | Reply

Wait until the Demo Co tries to get paid.

And the fake gold Trump Palace Ballroom will be an eyesore inside and out.

#19 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 12:07 PM | Reply

America is under assault.

#20 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-10-24 12:17 PM | Reply

Trump's ballroom is cursed.

Nothing good will come of it; no good will come to the people building it or attending functions in it after it's done.

It's going to make a good ghost story until someone burns it to the ground.

#21 | Posted by Zed at 2025-10-24 12:17 PM | Reply

@#18 ... it was structurally troubled. It was a necessity. ...

How so?

#22 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-24 12:22 PM | Reply

Gaslighter, use google -------.

#23 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 12:37 PM | Reply

I understand that he's already ordered the slot machines and card tables.

#24 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 12:42 PM | Reply

Hey republicans, how did you allow this to happen?
Why have no one. Questioned them over this?

#25 | Posted by a_monson at 2025-10-24 12:54 PM | Reply

"Hey republicans, how did you allow this to happen?"

There isn't a Republican alive who even cares.

#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-10-24 01:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trump is a builder. Contrast his "getting things done" to the over regulation that is stifling the Palisades fire recovery.

#27 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 01:08 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Trump is a destroyer
#27 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

The man is chaos incarnate.

#28 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-10-24 01:10 PM | Reply

Creation is a destructive act. -Someone said sometime.

#29 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 01:16 PM | Reply

Creation?

What has been created?

Who's paying for it?

You don't know.

You don't care.

You're simply Trump's *itch.

#30 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-10-24 01:18 PM | Reply

The list of donors is public information.

#31 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 01:23 PM | Reply

When we were saying that the Trump WH is For Sale, we meant influence peddling.

Now that's been doubled down on; these Ballroom 'Donors' are investing in buying influence.

www.factcheck.org

But Trumpers are OK with that... they love their Billionaire Masters.

#32 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 01:32 PM | Reply

I suspect two things will eventually become public knowledge (after some effort to conceal them):

1. The estimate cost will greatly increase. It has already increased to $300 M. My guesstimate is it'll be $500 M.

2. The list of donors will shrink and/or they'll donate less than they have pledged.

At a time that the government is shut down and the wealthy are being given large tax breaks, this construction can best be described as a pathetic, shameful project.

#33 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2025-10-24 01:34 PM | Reply

Trump is a builder. Contrast his "getting things done" to the over regulation that is stifling the Palisades fire recovery.

#27 | Posted by visitor_

You are on stupid pile of s(*&.

#34 | Posted by jpw at 2025-10-24 01:34 PM | Reply

The list of donors is public information.

POSTED BY VISITOR_

But not how much they donated (or will have to donate to finish it). Or what they will expect in return.

#35 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 01:34 PM | Reply

We can rebuild the east wing and the orange bunker boy's hideout...

RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!

#36 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-10-24 01:35 PM | Reply

Contrast his "getting things done" to the over regulation that is stifling the Palisades fire recovery.

#27 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Ok. Done. So what is your point. Exactly?

AI Overview

+5
No, regulations are not preventing rebuilding after the Palisades fire; in fact, the government has issued executive orders to expedite the process by suspending certain regulations like some local permitting laws and environmental reviews. However, rebuilding still requires obtaining permits and following updated fire safety codes, and some residents have reported delays due to other issues like conflicting inspector opinions

#37 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 01:40 PM | Reply

Requiring six story concrete caissons for a 2000 sq foot house doesn't seem excessive?

#38 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 01:44 PM | Reply

Requiring six story concrete caissons for a 2000 sq foot house doesn't seem excessive?

#38 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Wouldn't that depend on the circumstances?

Are you a structural engineer? Do you think you are a geotechnical or structural engineer? Are you capable of determining that without professional guidance and help?

I have no idea wtf you are talking about but I am sure there are very specific and rare circumstances where such an extreme foundation might be necessary to ensure structural safety. A geotechnical and structural engineer would need to make this determination.

#39 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 01:50 PM | Reply


This breaks my heart
~ TruthLies

DramaKid comes through in the clutch.

Does this really "break your heart"? What weak man you are.

FFS Citizens,the President puts up a tent for State dinners, this is the USA. Given there's a lawsuit to stop Trump from building, is there anything Trump is doing that you won't oppose?

Ok. Done. So what is your point. Exactly?

That when politicians say "we can rebuild" (Newsom), "we can stream line a process" (Bass,Mamdani) they are lying.

Trump in this counter example just shows you how messed up anti-growth advocates were, and the laws/regulations they created. America can build things, but the legal process is 1/3 of the costs, and 300% of the time, typically driving new home costs, new transit costs so high they don't get built.

Plenty of books on this topic, "Abundance", "Why nothing works". Read DonorBot, its fundamental.

Did you know a Chinese 20+ story apartment building caught on FIRE and didn't collapse.
www.nbcnews.com

Why does this happen in America with so much regulation?? WTC7?

#40 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-10-24 01:56 PM | Reply

Keep thinking a one story house needs a six story foundation and be surprised that only the ultra-wealthy can live there.

#41 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 01:56 PM | Reply

Well, that's another barrier to unchecked power demolished.
On to whatever else might be next on Old Yeller's list of oh, well, what the hell, why not shatterables.
Just to prove he operates without adult oversight.
A goddamn shame and totally preventable.

#42 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-10-24 01:57 PM | Reply

Keep thinking a one story house needs a six story foundation and be surprised that only the ultra-wealthy can live there.

#41 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

What makes you think I think that?

And how is that relevant to reality?

#43 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 01:58 PM | Reply

That when politicians say "we can rebuild" (Newsom), "we can stream line a process" (Bass,Mamdani) they are lying.

This also applied to DOGE. It was all BS, you hope for the best, but nothing gets done.

Things are too complicated for change, thanks to the byzantine law structure in America.

This is also why ObamaCare can't be unwound easily.

#44 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-10-24 02:00 PM | Reply

Read DonorBot, it's fundamental.

Send me the link to this "Donorbot" and perhaps I will read it.

Sounds like an interesting read. (Unlike your weak sauce)

#45 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 02:00 PM | Reply

I wonder if the rubes will catch on when the finished deal has onion domes.

#46 | Posted by 2020Rocks at 2025-10-24 02:06 PM | Reply

"Given there's a lawsuit to stop Trump from building, is there anything Trump is doing that you won't oppose?"

Good question.

I am opposed to supporting evil on earth. So I am opposed to his very existence. As I would be opposed to any other evil demon from hell trying to rule over me.

The world will be a better place when he is gone from it.

You don't like my opinion?

Tough.

Try and take it from me.

#47 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 02:09 PM | Reply

Donald 'Boondoggle' Trump... it's right there in his name.

Everything he does is some kind of scam intended to enrich himself, no one else.

Stopping a war isn't for the victims, it's for a Peace Prize. Attacking US cities isn't because of actual Insurrections, it's because politics.

Shutting down the Gov isn't for policy differences, it's to stop a vote on releasing the Epstein Files.

And building a Ballroom bigger than the WH isn't for the People, it's for the vested interests and for his yuge ego.

#48 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 02:14 PM | Reply

Cool! Dance while people have no healthcare and are starving! Priorities!

#49 | Posted by Brennnn at 2025-10-24 02:33 PM | Reply

I don't know what you little babies are upset bout......bill clinton had a ballroom...there was a sign on the wall that said.

?NO DANCING ALLOWED"

and with JFK it was the swimming pool.

lol

#50 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-10-24 02:56 PM | Reply

And building a Ballroom bigger than the WH isn't for the People, it's for the vested interests and for his yuge ego.

#48 | Posted by Corky

I know the other girls in your ladies auxiliary
aren't familiar with thins like this but I know
people who have performed at state functions and they've been embarrassed to have world leaders in a tent.

--but since you and the other girls are okay with
people defecating outdoors...that's no big deal.

#51 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-10-24 03:01 PM | Reply

"That would be the entire East Wing of the presidential residence, which has stood for 120 years.

"He's tearing down the entire East Wing to build his stupid ballroom. I mean, look at this," Meyers marveled. "This is like a sequel to Fixer Upper called ------ Upper.

"And of course, Trump also lied about this project." When he first announced it, he promised no demolition and said it "won't interfere with the current building" because it would be "near it but not touching it".

"So he basically promised to treat it like his marriage," Meyers quipped. (Seth Meyers)

more

www.theguardian.com

#52 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 03:06 PM | Reply

but since you and the other girls are okay with
people defecating outdoors

POSTED BY -------------------- to ---- all over the Capitol Rotunda

#53 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-10-24 03:08 PM | Reply

--but since you and the other girls are okay with
people defecating outdoors...that's no big deal.

JFC.

#54 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-10-24 03:18 PM | Reply

DANG IT..........been so busy I forgot

THIS POOL DEDICATED TO JFK

--water boating AND swallowing
not only allowed but encouraged.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

#55 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-10-24 03:18 PM | Reply

The Ballroom will be larger, uglier, and more expensive yet.
It is being constructed for the primary purpose of laundering money and buying influence.
It's secondary purpose is to massage the fractured ego of a mentally ill president.
We've come quite a ways from when people around Ike were discrete about his brand of golf ball.
To do otherwise would have been unseemly.

#56 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-10-24 03:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I know people who have performed at state functions and they've been embarrassed to have world leaders in a tent.
#51 | POSTED BY SHRIMPTACODAN

I'm sorry, but Tiffany Haddish's bat mitzvah was not a "state function" and Billy Crystal, Wanda Sykes, and Chelsea Handler are not "world leaders."

#57 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-10-24 03:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

According to Steve Bannon, Trump will be staying a third term.... so it makes sense him building an addition:

www.youtube.com

at 1:20

He also says that Trump is, "a vehicle of Devine Providence", "an instrument of Divine Will", but we won't go into that.

You're velcome!

#58 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 03:41 PM | Reply

Truth,

From AI:

White House changes without congressional approval.

"Presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama made significant White House modifications " architectural, functional, or technological " without separate congressional votes.

Theodore Roosevelt " 1902
William Howard Taft " 1909
Franklin D. Roosevelt " 1933"1939
Harry S. Truman " 1948"1952
Dwight D. Eisenhower " 1953"1958
John F. Kennedy " 1961"1963
Lyndon B. Johnson " 1965
Richard Nixon " 1969"1970
Gerald Ford " 1975
Jimmy Carter " 1979
Ronald Reagan " 1983"1985
George H. W. Bush " 1989"1991
Bill Clinton " 1993"1999
George W. Bush " 2001"2008
Barack Obama " 2010"2016"

#59 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-10-24 04:22 PM | Reply

Mark my words, a golf course is next.

#60 | Posted by 2020Rocks at 2025-10-24 04:23 PM | Reply

R Theodore Roosevelt " 1902
R William Howard Taft " 1909
D Franklin D. Roosevelt " 1933"1939
D Harry S. Truman " 1948"1952
R Dwight D. Eisenhower " 1953"1958
D John F. Kennedy " 1961"1963
D Lyndon B. Johnson " 1965
R Richard Nixon " 1969"1970
R Gerald Ford " 1975
D Jimmy Carter " 1979
R Ronald Reagan " 1983"1985
R George H. W. Bush " 1989"1991
D Bill Clinton " 1993"1999
R George W. Bush " 2001"2008
D Barack Obama " 2010"2016

#61 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-10-24 04:25 PM | Reply

Word on the street is, its going to be named The Monica Lewinsky Ball Room.

#62 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-10-24 04:46 PM | Reply

lmao... all those Pres did the equivalent of tearing down an entire wing of the WH with no consultation with Congress, no permit, and used it to peddle influence to wealthy donors.

Good job, BJ!

#63 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 05:02 PM | Reply

White House changes without congressional approval.

Changes?

Most presidents change the drapes, or the wallpaper.

Trump demolished the East Wing of the White House.

It's not his property.

You ------- disease.

#64 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-10-24 05:10 PM | Reply

#61 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Did they also all claim/promise they wouldn't destroy a whole wing of the White House then proceed to tear the whole wing down?

#65 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-10-24 05:23 PM | Reply

Bill uses artificial intelligence to express his natural stupidity

Anyone who argues past changes to the white house are in any way comparable to tripling the size of the white house is a disgusting vile, despicable liar.

Full ------- stop.

The White House is one the primary symbols of America and it's heritage.

No single person should just ------- change that, full ------- stop.

Anyone who argues differently is beneath contempt.

Trump is building a tacky, unnecessary eyesore that will serve zero purpose other than inflating his ------- ego. how many ------- balls does the white house have?

it is disgusting

it is pissing on our shared heritage

It is like smearing ---- on the walls of congress

Oh yeah, magat scum did that too

#66 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-10-24 05:40 PM | Reply

For once, I'm actually in agreement with PravdaPain. This shit is indefensible.

#67 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-10-24 05:44 PM | Reply

Adding tacky fucking gold painted ornaments to the oval office is disgusting but you won't hear me commenting on it as it is well within norms.

Paving over the garden planted by a beloved First Lady of an assassinated president is pissing on our history.

Some people fucking care about that shit. IT IS WHO WE FUCKING ARE. The White House is known as the People's House. Every president until this one has respected the relationship between his occupancy and the structure. Yes, changes can happen, but they should ONLY happen after careful consideration over the history and traditions that define us. A president is a temporary occupant of a building that belongs to ALL OF US. Trump is the first one to act like it is his house

Tearing down a wing of the WH to build a pointless ballroom is a breathtaking display of disrespect for our country

All because one single person wanted it.

He doesn't care about the countless Americans who hold that building precious as a secular symbol of the greatness of the promise of America.

He simply does not care about our history, ANYTHING that came before him means nothing to him.

It represents in a real tangible way how little he cares about what America is all about.

#68 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-10-24 05:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This shit is indefensible.
#67 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

And yet Deplorable Trumping MAGAts try their best.

#69 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-10-24 06:20 PM | Reply

Carter put solar panels on the roof, causing damage that had to be fixed during Reagan's term.

#70 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 07:16 PM | Reply

Ok, so the next dem president can just demolish the trump ballroom easy peasy

#71 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-10-24 07:26 PM | Reply

CNN report from 2010: $376 million White House renovation during the Obama Administration. Where was the Democrat outrage then? Also that was paid for by the taxpayers.

#72 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-10-24 07:51 PM | Reply

AI Overview
The White House Rose Garden has been significantly redesigned multiple times, with key renovations in 1913, 1961 (under John F. Kennedy), and 2020 (under Melania Trump). Another major, controversial overhaul was completed in 2025 under Donald Trump, which replaced the lawn with a concrete patio.
1913: First Lady Ellen Wilson had the space transformed from a colonial garden into a formal rose garden with hedges and roses.
1961-1962: President John F. Kennedy initiated a major renovation with designer Rachel Lambert Mellon to create a more open space suitable for larger gatherings, with a large central grass panel.
2020: First Lady Melania Trump's redesign involved removing crabapple trees, adding a limestone walkway, and updating flower beds. This was considered the most significant change since the 1960s.
2025: Donald Trump's administration completed another renovation, removing the lawn entirely to install a large concrete patio, which drew criticism

#73 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-10-24 07:53 PM | Reply

After many years, decades before Trump, I've noticed that and/all liber dems 'goto' is to bitch about any and all when Republicans are in office, and pretty much ignore any/all when a dem is in office -so libbies, do continue to bitch away as you cannot help yourselves as that is the mentality condition you are born with and we conservatives take that in account.

#74 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-10-24 07:58 PM | Reply

"as that is the mentality condition you are born with and we conservatives take that in account."

#74 | Posted by MSgt

That's right up there with the dumbest things I've read on the Retort lately--a high bar indeed.

#75 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-10-24 08:08 PM | Reply

MSGT serious question can you read at a 5th grade level?

First

The 2010 White House renovation was a four-year, multi-million dollar infrastructure project to replace outdated and failing systems, primarily in the East and West Wings. The project, which was named the "White House Big Dig" by the press, involved excavating underground to upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing, and HVAC systems, and was funded by a congressional appropriation approved in 2008 under the George W. Bush administration.

How is that in any way comparable to what Trump is doing?

I ask without hope of getting a reply.

Second

Your observation about the Rose Garden is that Trump previously desecrated that space.

Again, the Rose Garden was the brain child of a beloved First Lady who was the wife of an assassinated president.

As such the Rose Garden holds special meaning to Americans or at least those who cherish their nation's history.

NO ONE is saying Trump and Melania cannot have an impact, even a permanent impact on the house. That is absolutely appropriate EVEN IF SHITLER IS A DICTATOR

We are saying that what Shitler does should be respectful of the history of the White House. There are MANY ways he could have changed the White House and it's surroundings WITHOUT DESTROYING a third of it and then tripling the size of the building with a tacky pointless ballroom.

But, then again, you are too stupid to understand.

#76 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-10-24 08:10 PM | Reply

I want to point out something I missed the first time around

CNN report from 2010: $376 million White House renovation during the Obama Administration. Where was the Democrat outrage then? Also that was paid for by the taxpayers.

#72 | Posted by MSgt at 2

AND

"...was funded by a congressional appropriation approved in 2008 under the George W. Bush administration."

Typical magat scum reaction whatabout that Obama did something when it was actually his predecessor

#77 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-10-24 08:12 PM | Reply

- when Republicans are in office

We bitched, rightfully, about Reagan's Trickle Down that never ever did, and GW' Excellent Adventure for Yellow Cake... but neither of them ever tried to stay in Office after they lost an Election by Fake State Ballots and a riot of their thugs inside the Capitol Bld.... guess Trump just hates official buildings, eh?

Nor were they convicted of fraud and finger-rape. Nor were they Guinness World Record Level liars and thieves.

No, Trump isn't like any other Pres we've ever had with his greed and lies and arrogance, and we've got every right to bitch now... as do a lot of people who now feel stupid for voting for him.

It's funny though when Trumpers bring up Biden or Pelosi or Obama or any other Dem Pres, who never did any of those things.

#78 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 08:17 PM | Reply

The disgusting sack of child rape is doing to the White House what bin Laden did to the Pentagon.

#79 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-10-24 08:18 PM | Reply

Many of you have made a good point, a fancy new ballroom makes the rest of the White House look small and shabby. When the ballroom is finished Trump should tear down the rest of the White House and construct something much more grand. Something fit for a King.

#80 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-10-24 08:49 PM | Reply

#80

I have bad news for you; you'll never be his Queen no matter how much you fluff him.

His only love is himself.... America isn't even in the top 20.

#81 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 09:05 PM | Reply

@#74 ... After many years, decades before Trump, I've noticed that and/all liber dems 'goto' is to bitch about any and all when Republicans are in office, ...

Oh, I do agree, 100%.

And back in those times you cite, the "bitching" was about differences of political views. That was the political process of America.

But Pres Trump has brought us past differences in political views, and in the realm of the Republicans apparently sanctioning overt breaking of laws and the Constitution.

So, your comment seems to be little more than an attempt at a false equivalency.

What else yer got?



#82 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-24 10:15 PM | Reply

What donors to Trump's White House ballroom stand to gain from the federal government

www.cbsnews.com

Trump considering naming White House ballroom after himself

thehill.com

#83 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 10:21 PM | Reply

Trump considering naming White House ballroom after himself

Was there ever any doubt? It's what he does.

The Lewzer Center for the Performing Arts is not far behind. Nor is CVN USS Lewzer. Or the 2028 Lewzer Olympic Games. Or the 2026 FIFA Lewzer Cup.

#84 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-24 10:32 PM | Reply

There was always the chance he would name it The Jeffrey Epstein's Wingman Memorial Ballroom and Pedotorium.... but it was too long/

#85 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-24 10:40 PM | Reply

Twoothy,

You are a drama queen.

You were apoplectic of Chevron being overturned and predicted Armageddon, yet here we are. Ditto for the bombing of Iran's nuclear site, yet here we are.

Maybe calm down a bit. I don't want you to stroke out.

#86 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-10-24 10:52 PM | Reply

TruthHurts knows what is happening and what will happen. Just sayin.

#87 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-10-24 10:56 PM | Reply

Trump's gonna sell pieces of the white house.

#88 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-10-25 12:39 AM | Reply

Whoopy do.

The White House can host bigger gatherings now, not that anyone reading this will ever be on the guest list.

What a bunch of whiners.

Grow up babies.

#89 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-10-25 12:49 AM | Reply

The White House can host bigger gatherings now

For what reason?

#90 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-25 12:57 AM | Reply

Whoopy do.
The White House can host bigger gatherings now, not that anyone reading this will ever be on the guest list.
What a bunch of whiners.
Grow up babies.

#89 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-10-25 12:49 AM | Reply

Go get bent BillJohnson. This is totally wrong. It would also be wrong if a liberal lefty president did it.

#91 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-10-25 01:04 AM | Reply

BullJohnson is a Deplorable Trumping MAGAt.

He's a troll and nothing more.

He's a nonstop excuse machine for everything Trump.

#92 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-10-25 01:19 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort