I found it funny a woman registered her dog, and the dog voted. Everyone claimed it was just one person one vote ...
Ok, explain this .... what is the motivation for someone to do this?
Victorville Man Arrested on Federal Indictment Alleging He Paid People to Sign Ballot Petitions Using Stolen Voter Identities
Brass managed a team of signature collectors and collected signatures himself while Price and Herron were signature collectors who worked for Brass. From February 2026 to August 2026, the defendants used a database to identify registered California voters. On Skid Row, Brass and Price handed out these voters' stolen identities and paid petition signers to copy the voters' personal information onto ballot initiative petitions and fraudulently sign the petitions in those voters' names.
www.justice.gov
Now how many signatures do you guess were alleged to have "signed fraudulently"? 100? 1000? They need 831K to get it on the ballot, do you think anyone would pay thousands of dollars for a couple 1000 signatures?
More than likely its systemic but I am willing to entertain why this might be a one off ... take your best shot.
Now this ...
California Woman Federally Charged with Paying Individuals, Including Homeless People on L.A.'s Skid Row, to Register to Vote
Many of Skid Row's homeless population were not registered to vote. To ensure she maximized her pay from her coordinators, starting no later than 2025, Armstrong began offering payment to individuals not only to sign her petitions, but also to complete a voter registration form. Before going to Skid Row, Armstrong gathered a stack of voter registration forms from the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters.
Some homeless people did not have an address to put on the forms. On several occasions, Armstrong provided a homeless individual with her own former address in Los Angeles so they had something to write on the registration form. These registration forms simultaneously registered an individual to vote in California elections and in federal elections.
Because California automatically sends a vote-by-mail ballot to every registered voter, this also meant ballots in some homeless individuals' names could have the potential to be sent to Armstrong's former residence where the homeless individual did not live or collect mail.
www.justice.gov
Sure, its only one person, and probably affected what 1000 votes, 2000? So why, why would she do that?
It doesn't make any sense for someone to do this, because it wouldn't affect the outcome, right?? But 30, 40, 50 people like this?
Do you think that might affect an outcome?
Systemic fraud exists in the American system, its the only logical conclusion. It is clear and circumstantial evidence that there is systemic fraud.
IMO its actually enough to warrant change in the system.
So what exactly are you basing your claim on that Trump might use one?
#45 | Posted by BillJohnson
Donald Trump is a malignant narcissistic Sociopath.
In many ways he does not think other people actually exist.
He has acted throughout his second term as if he wants to solidify a legacy that will outlast him, because even in his sick demented mind he knows no one will honor him after he dies.
That is why he is obsessed with the ballroom and the arch and renaming ----.
There would be no clearer legacy then using a nuclear weapon.
In his sick, demented mind he would perceive himself as having the unique strength to use one-a historic figure. He thinks of himself in terms of the worst conquerors in history.
He is a very short-term thinker; long term strategic thinking does not occur to him.
There is no military solution to Iran.
Iran is kicking our ass. We are losing. Badly.
Piggy cannot, will not, accept defeat. He never has and never will. That is the essence of who he is.
Am I saying it is likely? Not at all
I am saying that the thought he wouldn't use one is simply insane.
I think some of the prime motivators to him would be the impact on him personally-the corruption and grift he is perpetrating, the bribes coming in from middle eastern dictatorships, the fact that using a nuke MAY even get republicans to support getting rid of him (long shot but who knows).
As for him saying he wouldn't, well that is just silly to think that means anything.