Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

"Was this study all immigrants or undocumented?"

All. But, I believe the programs they are looking at aren't accessible to illegal immigrants, unless they're obtained through fraud. Immigrants are 15% of the population but commit 5% of the welfare fraud; that's from another Cato study: www.cato.org

There's also this:
Immigrant and Native Consumption of Means-Tested Welfare and Entitlement Benefits in 2023
www.cato.org

Noncitizen immigrants"including those lawfully present in the United States on various temporary visas, lawful permanent residents, and illegal immigrants"consumed 53 percent less welfare than native-born Americans. Noncitizens were 7.5 percent of the population and consumed just 3.2 percent of all welfare. However, naturalized immigrants consumed 20 percent more welfare than native-born Americans because they were an older population"they consumed 6.6 times more Social Security and 5.4 times more Medicare than noncitizens on a per capita basis. Naturalized immigrants were 7.2 percent of the population and consumed 8 percent of welfare benefits.

And
"Other studies evaluating immigrant welfare participation and consumption use the household as the unit of analysis for all programs.9 However, we dispute this approach because many spouses and children of immigrants are native-born Americans."

See Also, and this is from a different source, hence the "high rate" comment:
cis.org
The high welfare use of immigrant households is not explained by an unwillingness to work. In fact, 83 percent of all immigrant households and 94 percent of illegal-headed households have at least one worker, compared to 73 percent of U.S.-born households.

It was a forgettable show by a forgettable artist that delivered very little of its promises. I was excited that he kept saying this was a unifying event. That he was going to use the forum to show unity and to embrace our differences (his direct words). Instead, he delivered a show that only served to show the history of a land with about 1% of the population of America and to show off his gyrating dancing skills.

Overall, it wasn't any better or worse than any other average show. Problem is, it was all in Spanish which inherently doesn't serve to unify anyone since the large majority of the audience was not able to understand him. His words may have been the most prophetic, most resounding and capable words to unify this country but very few would even know.

When I saw them prepping and saw so many people dressed as plants, I thought it was going to be an amazing visual spectacle. Instead, I barely even noticed anything from that aspect of the show. Being objective, it wasn't a good show and it wasn't a bad show. The only people who thought it was a good show are those with a liberal agenda (who are still trying to justify it was a good show by making things up like "you didn't even have to know Spanish"...yes, yes you did and it's not even arguable) and the only people who thought it was a bad show are those with a conservative agenda (who hates anyone that even uses any hint of non''Murican English and judges without even at least watching first).

If you actually judge by vocal talent, dancing talent, and a unifying message he promised...it fell short. But, even without being able to understand the words, it was still better than some I've seen recently so I wasn't mad at it. I just hate that it wasn't in any way what he promised. Which means it was all for views and marketing. Very much like The Weeknd performance that he tried to lead up to all year by staging costumes and such (which was awesome and I really loved he had it planned for so long) but then fell incredibly flat in the actual performance.

Related ...

www.politico.com

... Republican Sen. Thom Tillis slammed the Justice Department's push to criminally charge Democratic lawmakers who last November urged military servicemembers to disobey illegal orders in a video, calling it "political lawfare" in a post on X on Wednesday. ...

"Political lawfare waged by either side undermines America's criminal justice system, which is the gold standard of the world," Tillis wrote. "Thankfully in this instance, a jury saw the attempted indictments for what they really were. Political lawfare is not normal, not acceptable, and needs to stop." ...


Which lawyer wins?

#22 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

The one with the best AI.

AI has passed the bar exam. You only need the human now because an AI is not a person yet and you need someone to stand up in court.

AI is now helping to build itself. The Singularity is even Nearer. It could literally be only months away now. According to some experts.

"If you haven't tried AI in the last few months, what exists today would be unrecognizable to you."

I cannot possibly describe the danger of the rapid pace of change that is about to happen in the world. But think COVID.

This article will explain it way better than I can.

shumer.dev

If you are not using AI you are probably in trouble. You just don't know it yet. And you won't if you are not paying attention

This isn't a prediction about what might happen someday. This is OpenAI telling you, right now, that the AI they just released was used to create itself. One of the main things that makes AI better is intelligence applied to AI development. And AI is now intelligent enough to meaningfully contribute to its own improvement.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy