Re 59
Dang.. Well that did not print out the way I expected.
So I will try again with the "specifics".
There are so many of them.
Federal courts have ruled thousands of times that ICE has broken or failed to follow three main areas of law:
1. The Fifth Amendment and Federal Immigration Statutes (Unlawful Mandatory Detention)A massive legal battle centers on ICE's policy of locking up undocumented immigrants indefinitely without a hearing.
The Violation: ICE has bypassed statutory requirements to grant bond hearings. In August 2026, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals became the eighth federal appeals court to rule that ICE's blanket mandatory detention policy violates both federal immigration law and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
The Ruling: Courts have repeatedly held that individuals who have lived in the country for years have a constitutional right to a bond hearing before an immigration judge, which ICE attempted to strip away.
2. The Fourth Amendment (Warrantless Entries & Roving Patrols)
The Violation: ICE authorized its agents to use administrative warrants (documents signed by ICE itself, not a neutral judge) to enter private residences.
The Ruling: Legal organizations like the Brennan Center maintain this violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, which traditionally requires a judicial warrant to enter a home. Furthermore, federal judges have recently blocked ICE roving patrols in regions like Southern California, ruling that stopping people simply based on racial profile or appearance violates the Fourth Amendment.
3. Judicial Orders and Contempt of Court
The Violation: In over 4,400 rulings, federal judges have ordered ICE to release specific individuals who were jailed illegally or to stop certain enforcement tactics.
The Ruling: Federal judges in jurisdictions like Minnesota and California have formally rebuked ICE for outright defying judicial authority"ignoring valid court orders to release detainees or transferring them away before a judge's order could take effect.
ignoring valid court orders to release detainees
#62 | Posted by donnerboy
That's just liberal judges doing their activism and legislating from the bench, and ICE is right to ignore those orders.
Also, the fact that ICE is routinely violating the law is completely separate from the "allegations" of these deportees.
It's completely unfair to judge ICE as untrustworthy and deceitful as an organization, just because of a mere 4,400 rulings that ICE is detaining people illegally.
--JeffJ