" the president's son lied on a mandatory gun-purchase form by saying he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs".

And what percent of current gun owners would also qualify? Remember folks, marijuana is still illegal federally, so any use is considered abuse.

" How much for signing a check with the wrong memo?"

Which is then written off as legal fees?

How did micro-manager Trump not recognize $400,000 in non-existent legal fees on the tax return he signed?

" IF they're serious about guns, they'll lock this criminal up."

And what should be done about stoners with guns?

SCOTUS ruled three of the nine restrictions as unconstitutional.

One would exonerate Hunter.

Another, allow Trump to arm himself:

From the above link:
Third Circuit concluded that 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), which makes it unlawful for felons to possess firearms, was unconstitutional as applied to a defendant whose past felony was a nonviolent fraud offense.

" There's a lot of people out there who have felony convictions and served time for exactly what Hunter did."

Trey Gowdy disagrees. He said he hadn't seen 10 cases in his entire career.

What's your definition of "a lot" ... ?

" I'm willing to bet if Hunter receives prison time he will pardon Hunter and it will come during the last week of his first (and probably only term)"

So basically, what Trump did for Flynn, Manafort, Stone ...

As usual, the worst Republicans can imagine for Democratic behavior is what Republicans have done in the past.

" You won't hear me gripe if he pardons Hunter."

I'll take Total Bullschittt for $1,000, Mr. Jennings.

" The case itself was a straightforward slam-dunk."

Except the case is never brought in a vacuum. Earlier I referred to Trey Gowdy, and miss-attributed a line about him not seeing ten cases like that in his career.

Instead, he said something closer to "I bet there aren't ten cases like this that have been brought."

ABC News looked into it, and couldn't find a single one.

Were you looking for "lawfare" ... ? YOU'VE FINALLY FOUND IT.

" I understand the argument that were he to do so it would be an abuse of pardon power."

Dude, you were dead silent when Trump pardoned Stone, dead silent when Trump pardoned Manafort, and dead silent when Trump pardoned Bannon.

Maybe you should sit this one out.

" Are you incensed that Trump pardoned Stone?"

Clearly you're not. Or weren't, since you never condemn it once, or even SUGGESTED it was an abuse of pardon power.

" would you be incensed if Biden were to pardon his son?"

For prosecutions usually not brought??? Or are you purposely avoiding the salient part?

FFS, you've been screaming LAWFARE for weeks. Now it's biting you in the arse, and suddenly you pretend it doesn't exist.

" Neither he nor Trump should have ended up in front of juries for charges"

What a riot.

Nobody can name a single Trump indictment any regular Joe could do without fear of legal repercussions, and nobody can find an example of gun charges like this when another crime hasn't been committed.

But they're both the same, right morons?

" I've been very clear"

Yes. You've screamed LAWFARE for weeks, at the top of your lungs.

Meanwhile, here's a gun charge never brought, and you can't be bothered to whisper, much less scream.

What a hack.

" You are spending a lot of time trying to tie Hunter Biden's conviction to Trump's in an attempt to claim a "Lawfare" equivalence."

Dude, are you interested in battling LAWFARE, or are you just embarrassed you keep pointing to LAW?

How is bringing gun charges which never get brought NOT Lawfare?

If you don't stand up to this, it's obvious you're only interested when a certain letter is after the name.

" in the same breath you are ALSO trying to suggest that Trump's prosecution was apolitical"

Have you found a single charge based on politics, or are you your usual FOS self?

Seriously, if you can't name a single charged crime you or I could do without legal fears, you don't get to pretend the prosecution was political.

" I can name plenty."

Bullschittt.

You've had two dozen chances, and you've never pointed to a single indictment.

Now's your chance. No more ---- around. Either point to the indictment you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions, or have the class to admit you can't.

This, of course, is where you always run away.

" can't say that of the Bragg indictments. "

That's because you weren't paying attention. On purpose.

You seem to do that A LOT.

" I'm not taking your bait. "

This isn't about BAIT. It's about you being a lying sack of schittt.

It's about the fact you claim you could name "plenty", and when challenged you always run away. Or in this case, proffer the lamest of lame excuses.

The fact is you've been asked again and again, and can't even name ONE, and never have, despite dozens of requests.

Last chance. Either point out an indictment of Trump's which you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions, or admit you can't.

" you are not engaging in a good faith discussion "

You made a claim.

I challenged your lie.

You refuse to answer or address.

It looks like "good faith" is yet ANOTHER entry needed in your Dictionary.

"every time, you run away rather than address it."

I'm beginning to see a pattern here.

" a State criminal case under statutes that have been similarly used almost 10k times"

In 9 years, an average of four a day.

"It never happens" ...

... except every other work hour.

" Trump is guilty, but we don't need to tell you of what exactly."

Tell us you weren't paying attention without using those specific words.

" It should be embarrassing "

This, from the same moron who claimed he could point out "plenty" of unfair indictments of Trump, then ran away when challenged.

Here's your chance, Bellringer.

Don't embarrass yourself.

"Each one of you"

We're not talking about anyone but you, and your claim you could point out "plenty".

Here's your chance. Point AT LEAST ONE out ...

... or admit you can't.

Simple, really. Were you were lying when you made that claim, or were you telling the truth?

" Only one of those indictments has been adjudicated. I have been very clear with my opinions on it. "

BFD.

You've still pointed out ZERO examples of LAWFARE, and ONLY examples of LAW. You claimed you have "plenty".

Do it, or admit you can't.

" Hur set it up by investigating Biden for a near identical crime but let him off because he believes a jury would find Biden too mentally enfeebled to stand trial."

Then why didn't the DOJ go after Pence?

" Hunter Biden was singled out for harsher treatment than any other comparable defendant would have been in the normal run of fed prosecutions. That's injustice"
~Harry Litman, former U.S. Attorney and Deputy Assistant Attorney General.

" we need to prosecute gun laws to the fullest extent."

Great idea.

Let's start with an annual mandatory hair follicle test.

" If you can find one you can have it tested."

What a riot.

Even bald men have hair follicles. Thousands and thousands on the average scalp.

You were saying?

"The government is prosecuting on gun offenses"

...which never get brought unless the person uses the gun in furtherance of other crimes. Or their last name is Biden.

Trey Gowdy said he hadn't heard of 10, ABC News couldn't find a single one, and other prosecutors said they'd NEVER bring a charge like this.

But if gun owners can be arrested for drugs, I'm all for it. For example, anyone who believes gun-owner DJTJ isn't on drugs is a total moron.

How about a mandatory piss test/follicle analysis annually for gun owners? Anyone who pisses dirty gets a felony charge.

Fair enough?

"do you want the government going after drug users purchasing guns or not?"

Sure. Annual piss test or annual follicle test?

"it's either let everyone who uses drugs have guns or the government needs to prosecute "

There's probably a sensible third option in there, somewhere.

But we've set the precedent, haven't we? ANY gun owner using drugs needs to turn their gun in to the authorities, or face felony charges.

Are you onboard?

" Are you onboard?"

Waffles, where'd you go? Can we count on your support?