These little reprobates who are afraid to shave because they are scared their facial hair may not return ...
~ R2D2

They're only 21, and this photo might be from the previous arrest..

He has faced charges previously?
~ Gaslighter

First time reading the news in America?

Did you know there are killers running around free in America with 33 prior arrests.... but we can't talk about that because its racist.

about 1 for every two citizens, which is more than cameras than the rest of the world combined.

This is just a whataboutism from the queen of whataboutisms.

American doorbell cameras have worse privacy than Flock, and there are WAY more doorbell cameras.

Flock cameras: 120,000
Doorbell cameras: 60,000,000

Incredible videos coming out on the difference between the construction of buildings in Columbia and Venezuela.

I love Lenin, I love Fidel Castro and I love Che Guevara. They are genuinely ------- heroes.

Here's another PRO flock article.

Impoverish the white middle class!

I don't want to live in a surveillance state at all," said member Jordana Bloom.

Why? Its scary statement ... "surveillance state" ... oooooh scary like communists!

But you allow your phone to track your every move..... we do so willingly for better ads.

Wouldn't stopping crime, lowering crime, be a better reason to track your every move?

Flock, Mass Surveillance, and the Collapse of Crime

Joshua Reed Eakle says that "in America we believe that liberty is more important than security." Do we? This isn't a statement I find meaningful. We clearly don't maximize liberty in every possible situation, but rather usually consider tradeoffs. Most of us would be happy for the police to detain us for a few minutes in order not to be hacked to death. And nobody says get rid of jails because, even if we are sure most people there are guilty, some innocent person is surely being locked up somewhere, and we must always choose liberty over safety. What is relevant is what kind and how much liberty and security we're talking about.

That is to say that there's no way to avoid cost-benefit analysis in situations like this. They pretend this is about larger principles, but it seems that anti-Flock advocates are going based on their own mood affiliation, which has a bias toward the status quo and against new forms of technology. We barely register large, multiyear drops in the murder rate, even though they cumulatively represent thousands of lives saved. At the same time, a couple dozen stalking cases facilitated by Flock will become national news, and while regular victims of crime are collapsed into unanimated numbers, those victimized in a novel way get the complexities of their inner emotional lives put on full display. When we're dealing with status quo problems, we express harms in terms of statistics, while moral panics are written about in the language of poetry.