Good advice.
#3 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS

Probably better advice is to not run over pedestrians, or is this now acceptable?

After she was shot in the face, she lost control of the car, which is why she ended up crashed on the side of the road.
#47 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

This is false, just a narrative you're trying to pawn off.

We know this because she turned the steering wheel. Hit the accelerator.

How you can look at that and think it's okay is beyond me.
#48 | Posted by Alexandrite

Because it's an image meant to persuade you.
How you don't understand that is beyond me.

There's trump lying about the situation he created.

#53 | Posted by Alexandrite

Actually Biden created it.
Trying to enforce law is not a created situation, it's required to have a good civil country.

Are the ICEholes responsible for her cold blooded murder under arrest yet?
#62 | Posted by donnerboy

Define "responsible".

She was under arrest but not arrested.
She chose to flee, similar to drivers when surrounded by protestors.

Do protestors now have more authority than law enforcement officers?

You're a turd.
#67 | Posted by Alexandrite

Perhaps, but I am correct.

Biden allowed in 9 Million or more illegal immigrants , then granted them temporary status.

Now Trump has removed that status and people decided to ignore the law.

Bidens whole purpose was to have people like this woman getting shot to create outrage against law enforcement.

Mayor of Minneapolis actually said people would die, it's what they want. For political optics. See J6 yesterday at the Capitol.

Sad but true.

#74 there's three angles I have seen.

She definitely hit him. In another thread I have posted this video and others.

Biden is happily retired and has nothing to do with this.
- donorbot

Ridiculous it's why Trump was elected.

If Biden hadn't opened up the border without getting trump would have lost to Harris

Harris only dominated White Liberal women, and white men that are ------.

So you're not an open borders liberal today, Mr. Fraud?

As I have stated millions of times, you apply to the country get vetted and you should get citizenship.

But that's not what Biden did. He literally did the opposite.

The fact that you don't understand open borders policies isn't surprising.

She didn't accelerate until after 4 shots were fired.

#83 | Posted by Alexandrite

I think it in the other thread, it's a top down view from down the street.

#88 other thread you can still use the link and watch? I do this on my work machine where I don't have access or ever login.

Trump lied and said the officer that got bumped is in the hospital.
- alex

He got bumped and looked to have a limp. He probably went to the hospital to get it checked out, union and all.

He's just using equivocation which you never have called out others for doing.

Sure thing Commie Spyboy. Repeating maga lies like a good little cuck doesn't make you a man.

#94 | Posted by donnerboy

Well documented on 538. I guess they are Communist for telling the truth.

Is this your argument?

Why are you talking about Ashli Babbit?
#137 | Posted by A_Friend

Can't tell them apart can you.

Which is my point.

Saw the video - he didn't have to fire his weapon
- brass

They never have too, but he couldn't see the way the wheels were turned.

This shouldn't have happened, IMO, but this is what happens when you try to kill an ant with a hammer.
- brass

The mayor of Minneapolis foretold it would happen.

I think most Lumpers here were hoping for it.
Sure a woman had to die, but it was for the cause, now they can protest.

Touching a cop with a car, if that even happened, is NOT a cause to shoot the driver.
- Corky

Well it's easy to play Monday morning QB.
He had no idea she was going to turn, he had no view of her front wheels. She hit the gas, struck him and continued...

Given this moving the car forward would appear as an attack, and self defense is warranted.

I have seen many vehicles attacked by protestors for such an offense. No crime. Pedestrian has right of way.

The cause is coloring your glasses.

Babbitt was continuing an illegal activity, along with a mob, towards officers in the Capitol.
- brass

And the lady was being apprehended for obstruction.

Your point is a distinction without a difference.

When Vigilantism starts and the tables are turned remember MAGA'ts, you built this
- A_Moron

Biden built this. I have been saying this before Trump was elected.

#159

Silly point.

I can't imagine a world where your justice system is predicated upon previous convictions and time served.

Why no one takes you seriously and why you're at the top of the plonked list
- A_nother_moron

I don't care.

The situations were identical. Both were in violation of leo commands, both presented a clear and present danger to the officer and other citizens.

You can't refute it, nor can anyone else.

The penalty for "obstruction" in America is NOT death.
#166 | Posted by donnerboy

It is if you attack the officer trying to arrest you.

#172

Like I said White Liberal Women, righteous and outrageous.

No wonder US birth rate is collapsing.

Biden deported people without using the military on american streets.
- speakspoorly

Trump isn't using military either.

Get some facts from NBC then perhaps you can come out and play.

Question is, where were you on the Babbitt issue?
#179 | Posted by brass30

She, just like this women, unfortunately did the wrong thing at the wrong time.

Not innocent but not guilty. Put officers life in danger paid the price.

I defend J6ers in general, watching the video, her specific case I don't not.

THE VIDEO in #227 is the one to see.
... that video leaves no doubt; that was cold-blooded murder.
#278 | POSTED BY CORKY

This is BS. He's standing right in front of the vehicle, you can see his left knee twist as he attempts to avoid as she drives off.

I now believe at the moment he fired, he had no way of knowing her intent if this "agitator" was going to turn left towards him or right to leave.

He doesn't. He can't see the wheels/tires he drew his weapon on her initial movement, then she accelerated and he fired.

"I don't foresee riots. She was white."
Posted by low-life POS making jokes about the victim.
#277 | POSTED BY CORKY

No thats not a joke about the victim, its about the nature of the protests Lumpers tend to rally around.

Agent actually shot as she was driving by.

That's true...........
#269 | POSTED BY BRASS30

True but misleading, watch #227, he shot multiple times. His first shot was head on as he was trying to move out of the way..

Emily said she heard ICE agents telling the driver, a woman, to "get out of here."

Video evidence says otherwise.

"She was trying to turn around, ...

Then why did she reverse? The officers calmly walked up and attempted to open her car door. Emily doesn't mention any this.

Video evidence refutes our poor Emily.

"BBC is reporting that the ICE agent who murdered Renee Nicole Good has a habit of being "struck" by vehicles."

Well that kind of refutes his inexperience. Seems like he knew when he was in trouble, and when he wasn't.

What else can you conclude from the facts?

GFY hard... if that's possible.

LOL you sound upset.

That was a murder, and the 'nature of the protests' is you revealing your idiocy yet again.

Define murder? In the same was Ashely Babbit was "murdered", I agree unfortunate circumstances. But I wouldn't call it murder in the first degree.

You get involved with protests, and bad things can happen, 42 people died at BLM protests.

Basically an Ashli Babbitt then?

#108 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

YES this what I was referring too. All the J6 arguments from snowballs to ashli are identical, you've just switched sides.

Thats the Rorschach test.

June until now doesn't mean he had much experience, training or supervision

Either he has a "habit" or he doesn't. You get the reference was to claim he did this all the time, he has experience.....

You refute your own assertions now you're just reaching.

#311 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

They could but you'd him and haw about that too.

And he's BESIDE the car at that point, not in front of it.

Of course he eventually gets beside it, but he shot before that.

"C'mon dude - he's reaching for his gun before she is barely moving forward."

How long does he have to wait? Till he's injured?

Why don't drivers at protests get the same leniency?

You're logic dictates protesters have more authority than LEO. Crazy.

The other thing to consider is, given the situation and the driver, he fires at the car endangering his partner who is on the passenger side door.

Same thing in the Ashli case, she wasn't the person actually breaking in, but it was part of a mob banging on the door.

Here is a slowed down video.

He could have just stepped back from the car rather than going toward it.

Why? Why do protesters get to crowd the cars but officers putting people under arrest do not?

Also if you watch the slowed down video, he did backup once he heard the wheel spin.

#341 | POSTED BY CHANTRESSE

This is true and OK Imo. But what I think happened is there is a truck that passes in front of her at the start of the video. I think the ICE was in pursuit of that truck. Then she pulls out, blocking their progress. They were going to arrest her for obstruction and thats where it goes downhill.

Is this what cops are supposed to do?

Yes. Just like a protester.

Y'all claim that a vehicle is a "deadly weapon"... do cops usually put themselves in the "line of fire" of a deadly weapon when they are confronting someone?
- GTB

Yes, unlike in the UK where they ignore violence.

I'm sure the video will show it was unwarranted because these cosplaying p^$$ies can't handle their jobs.

#2 | Posted by jpw

Seems like people can't handle the officers just doing their work. Why not fight it in court, why harass and harangue officers?

What if Rightwingers did this for J6 people, would you feel the same?

Again its a real Rorschach test if you can see how these instances are very similar in most every significant regard. Either your are an objective observer, or you aren't.

Do protesters get to shoot the driver of the car if they get nudged?

This is the difference between authority and not. You're proposition is protesters can arrest and detain people? Seems like mayhem.

Can you give me an example of where a protester did that and they did not get charged with murder?

This is a false logical jump. Because you need to answer, can protesters arrest and detain people?

Protesters clearly jump on cars and block traffic, should people be able to just run them over?

Also, if she was a protester, following ICE and filming, I would assume she filmed this as well. THAT should be interesting to see.
#369 | POSTED BY GTBRITISHSKULL

Probably not, unless you wanted to prove she didn't have control of the vehicle, thus supporting the officers use of a weapon.

It didn't have to end this way, not by a long shot:

I agree, but tell that to the Mayer of Minneapolis, who days before foretold it would happen.

Did he amp up the people YES, could have have said something different to diffuse the situation.... Why YES, YES he could have.

Gal,

The ICE agent walking towards her window told her "get out of here!"

Thats not what he said. Watch the video again, this time without your filters.

Face it, She decided to endanger the lives of law enforcement and they defended themselves.

#515 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It's can be both legally justified and avoidable.

#502 | POSTED BY A_A_NOTHER_MORON

Nothing but rage porn, no wonder LyinYav approves.

Here's a pro hint A_NOTHER_MORON if LyinYav is in agreement, you're probably wrong.

ICE doesn't need authority to arrest someone to be able to defend themselves.

#530 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

ICE has the authority to arrest anyone that commits a felony while in the course of their duty, and she had committed a felony

Running at a car to open the door is not "defend themselves"

Just admit they ------ up. THey got mad and lost their ----.
#535 | Posted by Alexandrite

They didn't run they actually walked up quite calmly. She could have drove off then.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy permits the use of deadly force only when an officer reasonably believes there is an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to themselves or another person.

This is exactly what happened. Thanks for pointing that out Donorbot.

What felony?

They ran over to her door while she was just sitting there.
#554 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

Obstruction of Justice. They were in the act of apprehending her for committing the felony.

#547 Apparently, "and she had committed a felony"* = capital crime

If you're brainwashed enough to attack a federal officer with a deadly instrument per the statute the officer can use deadly force.