Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

Ukraine ready to sign landmark drone defense deal with U.S., sources say, amid new details on Kyiv's role in Iran war
www.cbsnews.com

... Ukraine is ready to sign a landmark drone defense deal with the United States, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is prepared to sign the deal on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly this week in New York City, but the sources said the deal may instead be finalized at a later date, when the U.S. is ready to sign.

Over the past year, the Department of Defense and its Ukrainian counterpart have developed a framework that would allow the two countries' militaries to expand testing and production of Ukrainian defense technology in the U.S.

The importance of expanding partnerships with Ukraine's defense industry has become increasingly clear to the U.S. and its allies throughout the war with Iran. During the first days of the war, Iran began targeting American military installations across the Middle East with Shahed one-way attack drones -- the same type of drones Russia has used to attack Ukraine's cities. As the U.S. and the Gulf states initially lacked cost-effective means to intercept the drones, Kyiv sent drone interceptors and pilots to help.

Ukraine has since signed defense agreements with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, among other countries. The agreements match foreign financing with Ukraine's burgeoning defense manufacturing industry. Zelenskyy has said Ukraine aims to make 10 million drones this year. By comparison, the U.S. Army acquired roughly 50,000 in 2025, according to former Army Secretary Dan Driscoll. ...


Another view ...

Navy says 8 USS Abraham Lincoln Strike Group sailors attempted suicide
www.upi.com

... [Senate Armed Forces Committee member Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.] rebuked President Donald Trump and the Pentagon on Wednesday for downplaying the impact the more than 250-day at-sea deployment had on the approximately 5,000 sailors on the Abraham Lincoln, saying the information provided by the Navy showed that conditions on the ship were "serious and deteriorating."

Gillibrand accused Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of openly disrespecting sailors' grievances after Trump said he was not concerned about the mental health of the crew and that the deployment actually should've been even longer while Hegseth said the reality had been "misrepresented."

"What Trump and Secretary Hegseth dismissed as 'fake news' turned out to be serious and deteriorating conditions for our service members," she said.

"That this administration can find endless taxpayer dollars for bombs, ballrooms and billionaires, but cannot take care of our armed services members, is completely unacceptable," added Gillibrand.

The Navy's former top lawyer, Rear Admiral Donald Guter, said the attempted suicides was a "disturbingly high number indicating a serious stress level." ...

[emphasis mine]


Related ...

State error in Texas creates huge backlog in voter registration applications as midterm voting nears
apnews.com

... County election offices throughout Texas are scrambling to process a massive backlog of voter registration applications stemming from an error at the state level, a headache that is hitting just as they are preparing for voting to begin in the midterm elections.

The problem, which officials in the Republican-controlled state have not publicly defined, also could have disenfranchised people who wanted to vote in the state's March primary but whose registration applications were never processed, local election officials said during a news conference Wednesday.

"This is really out of left field. Knowing that this one element of (state) applications didn't come through, and we had no insight on it," said Chris McGinn, executive director of the Texas Association of County Election Officials.

The size of the backlog statewide hasn't been determined, but the association said it is in the tens of thousands for some of the state's most populous counties. In Bexar County, which includes San Antonio, the election office received about 45,000 backlogged voter registration applications.

Some election offices will need to hire temporary workers to handle the crush, officials with the association said.

The issue started last October in the Texas Department of Public Safety, which among other things allows people to register to vote or update their voter registrations when they renew their driver's license.

An unspecified error failed to send a large number of records to applicants' home counties, where the applications are processed and verified. Those records could be a new voter registration application or an update to an existing registration, such as a change of address.

The association of local election officials said its members did not receive any communication from the Department of Public Safety about why the backlog occurred or why they were not informed of the issue for nearly a year. ...


Dummy with the Wig On Top - A Randy Rainbow Song Parody

www.youtube.com

(1 min Ground News commercial 1:18 to 2:18)

(NOT about Eberly!)

How Important and Urgent Was the Deal?

Geopolitically High (The Arctic Race): Proponents and security experts argue the deal is highly important due to the rapidly changing security environment in the Arctic. As polar ice melts, the region is becoming a hotbed for new maritime trade routes and untapped critical minerals. Because Russia has aggressively militarized its Arctic coast and China has declared itself a "Near-Arctic State," locking down Greenland's security and resources was seen by Washington as an increasingly urgent priority to protect the U.S. homeland.

Strategically Low (No Immediate Threat): Conversely, critics point out that the threat was never actually imminent. Adversary activity directly around Greenland remains virtually non-existent. Denmark"a fiercely loyal NATO ally"was already in complete alignment with the U.S. and would never have permitted a Russian or Chinese military base on the island anyway, making the "urgent" legal ban more of a formality than a response to an active crisis

Could This Have Been Done Sooner?

Critics, including former diplomats and political opponents, argue that the agreement absolutely could have been achieved much earlier and without the severe diplomatic fallout.

Manufactured Crisis vs. Real Diplomacy: Critics like former Ambassador Michael McFaul note that Denmark has always been a cooperative democratic ally. They argue previous administrations (like Obama or Bush) or even Trump's first term could have quietly negotiated these same expanded basing rights and investment screenings through standard diplomatic channels.

Aggressive Tactics Slowed Things Down: Rather than the deal being "delayed" by past presidents, critics argue it was President Trump's own aggressive tactics"such as threatening to forcibly "take" or annex Greenland"that created a massive diplomatic rift with Denmark. In this view, the months of quiet negotiations leading up to the September 2026 pact weren't solving a long-standing geopolitical puzzle, but were rather an effort by U.S. and Danish diplomats to clean up a self-inflicted diplomatic crisis and find an elegant way for Trump to claim a "victory".

The claim that President Trump's Greenland agreement is completely identical to the 1950s arrangement is partially true in its framework, but inaccurate because the new deal adds distinct and practical changes.

The Core Framework Is the Same

Built on the 1951 Treaty: The security agreement signed by the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland builds directly upon the historic 1951 Defense of Greenland Treaty between Washington and Copenhagen, which has long given the U.S. broad military access to the island.

Danish Sovereignty Maintained: Just like past decades, the agreement explicitly reaffirms that Greenland remains under the territorial sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark and rules out U.S. outright ownership or annexation.

What Actually Changed in the New Deal

Greenland Is at the Table: Unlike the bilateral 1951 treaty signed solely by the U.S. and Denmark, Greenland's own self-governing leadership is a direct, formal signatory to this agreement.

New Military Bases Authorized: The deal explicitly greenlights the process for the U.S. military to build and operate two new major defense sites/bases at Narsarsuaq in southern Greenland and Mestersvig in the east, alongside upgrades to the existing Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base).

Blocking Adversarial Investment: The pact introduces specific security-screening provisions and investment bans preventing non-NATO competitors"specifically China and Russia"from establishing military footprints or acquiring sensitive infrastructure and critical mineral/mining assets in Greenland.

Future Independence Planning: It includes political commitments ensuring that these defense arrangements and NATO alignment will remain legally binding and intact even if Greenland transitions into a fully independent nation separate from Denmark

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy