Truth,
"inalienable right to the healthcare they choose?"
No one has an inalienable right to whatever healthcare they choose.
We've had enough time now to see that people's decisions can be influenced by changing social values, cultural pressures, and the people around them. That is one reason I think potentially irreversible medical decisions deserve more serious and careful scrutiny.
As far as the military goes, I agree with the current decision. Transgender service can involve medical treatment, ongoing care, and accommodations that can raise legitimate questions about military readiness and deployment requirements.
Gay service members generally require no special medical accommodations simply because they are gay.
So trying to frame the transgender military issue as simply another version of gay rights is bogus. The two situations are not the same.
#59 | Posted by BillJohnson
Christ you're a dishonest monster
1. cis people have right to the same exact medical procedures that trans people are denied. that is a simple fact
2. You assume, without basis in fact, that trans people's healthcare is done with less scrutiny than cis peoples' healthcare. When the government starts banning breast reduction for cis women/girls like they do for trans people you might have a point, but you don't
3. You do realize that "medical treatment, ongoing care and accommodations" were not mentioned in the Executive Order banning their service. en.wikipedia.org Though the following language WAS used: "conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life" So, again you are either ignorant or a liar regarding trans in the military, which is it?
#4
You misspelled "zionists", you genocidal scumbag.