There G wagons in Atherton going to government food pickups....
It's really about effort. US gives away more social benefits than any country in the world
#15 | Posted by oneironaut
You fall for every turd of republican propaganda I swear.
"There G wagons in Atherton going to government food pickups
No, this claim is false.
The Daily Dot
Atherton's Context
Atherton, California is consistently ranked as the most expensive zip code in the United States.
No Government Food Pickup Program: There is no government-run food distribution program or public food pantry operating in Atherton.
Demographics: The town's ultra-wealthy residential baseline means there is no local public infrastructure set up for government food aid pickups.
Origin of the Rumor
This claim stems from a recurring internet viral trope and social media rage-bait.
Viral Social Media Posts: Photos and videos frequently circulate showing luxury luxury vehicles (such as Mercedes-Benz G-Class SUVs, Teslas, or Audis) in lines at drive-through food banks across Northern California and the Bay Area.
Context Misunderstandings: When luxury cars do appear at regional food banks (such as Second Harvest of Silicon Valley, which serves the broader San Mateo and Santa Clara counties), there are usually clear logistical reasons:
Volunteers and Delivery: Drivers in luxury vehicles are often volunteers picking up boxes to distribute to homebound seniors, low-income neighbors, or local shelters.
Sudden Job Loss / Asset Rich, Cash Poor: Individuals who recently suffered tech layoffs or financial crises may still own a vehicle purchased before their economic hardship.
Reddit
Borrowed Vehicles: Families without reliable transportation often borrow cars from family, friends, or employers to pick up groceries.
There is not 'right" temperature as it has been in flux since the atmosphere formed on the planet.
#11 | Posted by MSgt
You are SO INCREDIBLY ARROGANT AND STUPID that you don't even realize you're lying.
"Take a hundred modern humans, give them stone-age tools, and drop them into a random point in Earth's 4.6 billion-year history. The question is not when they would die, it is when they would thrive. The answer turns out to be surprisingly recent. For most of Earth's existence, the atmosphere was either too thin in oxygen, too rich in carbon dioxide, or too unstable to keep a community alive for more than a few weeks. The honest floor is roughly 298 million years ago. Anything earlier, and the air itself would kill them."
cosmosunveiled.com
"What is the earliest, geologically, that humans could have survived on Earth?
Fancy a trip to the Jurassic or Cambrian era? In order to survive the environments of the past people would need a number of things...
"If we used a time machine to travel back to a prehistoric period, the earliest we could survive would be the Cambrian (around 541 million years ago). Any earlier than that and there wouldn't have been enough oxygen in the air to breathe.
"At the beginning of the Cambrian, the air at sea level would have felt like base camp at Mount Everest, but the climate was milder and more uniform than today. A bigger problem would be finding something to eat because there were no land plants or animals. You'd need to find a way of catching trilobites and other strange-looking shellfish, without wood to make a spear or plant fibre to make a fishing net. And you'd have to eat them raw, unless you could find a way to extract oil from these animals, or burn dry seaweed."
www.sciencefocus.com