"So how much of crime is ok?"

None.

But we don't demand an entire city be put on lock-down, because one Quick Trip gets robbed.

EVERY plan you have to "protect" the vote would suppress a MAGNITUDE more LEGAL voters.

I'd actually have more respect for you if you'd just admit the truth.

"You idiots say it all the time."

Nonsense. Voter fraud happens in every state, and probably in most elections.

What intelligent folks realize is the violations amount to a fart in a tornado, and every attempt to "protect the vote" is really an attempt to disenfranchise "certain" voters.

VA, for example, has had ONE voter fraud case PER DECADE. What TF are you trying to prevent? And how many LEGAL votes would you be willing to suppress to thwart THOSE TWO ILLEGAL VOTES?

"Vote fraud is okay if it's just a little..."

Hey dumfuq, how do you explain the fact the MAJORITY OF VOTE FRAUD cases would be unaffected by stricter voter ID laws?

Headline is a lie.

Dems voted against because of the poison pill of the SAVE ACT in the new legislation.

Just like when Republicans would add " ... and repeal Obamacare" to every bill, then blame Dems for voting AGAINST the Puppies Are Good Act.

Next time, try putting the salient point IN the headline, rather than trying to bury it.

" Didn't Obama leave an appointment on the table for Trump to make?"

No, Mitch McConnell refused to have hearings, saying the electorate should make that decision.

The exact opposite of his ramming through ACB right before Biden took office.

This is also a good time to keep in mind: The government initially said over 15,000 illegals were voting in Nevada.

When proof was demanded, the government said it had proof 185 were illegals voting.

Nevada investigated, and found ALL 185 were legal citizens, eligible to vote.

Suppressionists would have suppressed more votes in ONE ELECTION CYCLE than all the vote fraud convictions in Nevada's history.

Regarding votes by illegals, does anyone believe Texas doesn't really care? OF COURSE NOT.

Well, Texas has had FOUR convictions for illegals voting, going back over a decade. So either they're not trying, they're woefully inept, or it doesn't happen at anywhere near the scale suppressionists pretend.

Which sounds most likely?

And here: ten defendants, over what time period? Five years?!?

Headline is a lie.

Progressives have never claimed voter fraud doesn't exist; it's just the Heritage Foundation's election fraud website makes it very clear: the plurality of fraud doesn't come from the voters themselves, it comes from canvassers, cullers, and campaigns. State's average ONE CONVICTION PER YEAR when it comes to the actual voter.

It's also important to note that in almost all of the cases, the illegal action involves ONE illegal vote. And when it IS the voter, it's usually the garden variety of voter fraud: addled elderly, folks who moved and forgot, folks who moved and thought the system forgot, and someone who returns an absentee ballot for a newly deceased household member.

THAT'S IT.