I wonder if he shouldn't do the same thing with this subject as well.
#25 | Posted by eberly
I wouldn't say ban.
My usual caveat: I'm an atheist in the traditional sense (I don't believe in any "God" or gods or salvation or afterlife, or care about creation [God and the big bang are both nonsense in my book]) but will defend religion and religions all day long, sometimes even their weirder manifestations.
Maybe more surprisingly, I could be the lone member of the bizarre DR faction that respects Corky and Eberly.
I've read NT Wright. I've made and continue to make a handsome living editing Christian theology for major publishers for 25 years, sitting around my house in my shorts.
Corky's postings are evangelical (in the good way) in a weird sense. He's sincere in what he's doing. But what he's doing, in my mind, is proselytizing and selling and posting for the sake of not discussing theology but about God's existence and Christianity's superiority ... to a vast audience that he's only going to rile up, and which always devolve into the same arguments about how science can't prove faith and sky fairies and now MAGA, and always underlying how Christianity, like communism, might be good if anyone ever tried it.
If Christianity is what gets Corky in a much larger boat, good for him.
I'd rather Bellringer write a barbecue thread, or have a rightwinger join in on the music thread occasionally.
Cannabis threads used to pull the DR together if we want to sing Kumbaya.
Hello, Eberly.
Gulf States Set to Urge Trump to Avoid Any Escalation With Iran
finance.yahoo.com